Title : Is it cheating to base my art on computer-generated images?
link : Is it cheating to base my art on computer-generated images?
Is it cheating to base my art on computer-generated images?
 |
| Artistic-looking mages created by computers courtesy Medium essay "What are Creative Adversarial Networks?" |
Barrett asks "I've seen these new CGI tools that can generate any kind of scene in any artistic style, and it makes me wonder: Is it OK for a painter to use computer-generated imagery for reference and inspiration? Sometimes it seems like the computer is doing the artistic work for me, and making aesthetic decisions, and I wonder if it's cheating for me to use them?"
My answer: Like photography, these new computer techniques merely present us with another way of seeing.
Artists have always been sponges for new imagery. You can see the effect of photography on painting over the last 150 years. There are so many types of lenses, films, and processes before you even get into digital manipulation and CGI. Photography lets us freeze action, see through things with x-rays, and witness wildlife action up close. Photography has given us new eyes.
That doesn't mean we have to project and copy the random detail of a single given photo, though that's OK, too, if that's what you want to do (as long as you take the photos yourself or you have cleared the copyrights, of course).
The more we understand how cameras see, and now how computers can generate images, the more we appreciate the little "meat cameras" we were born with. And the more we learn about technologically-derived imagery, the more we realize our eyes and our visual brains behave very differently.
In my case, I'm usually trying to interpret my experience of reality directly into a sketchbook, or I'm trying to visualize a scene from the ancient past or from a science fiction future. I often think about photos I've seen and the effects they create, and I'm influenced by those images.
In some cases I want my paintings to look like photos so that they can fit into a magazine presentation that's mostly comprised of nature photos. To get those effects, I try to learn the theory behind photography, and I also surround my easel with a lot of different reference photos, taking a little from one and a little from another to make something new.
I don't know how the CGI technology will influence me, but I welcome it and am not threatened by it. Some CGI video imagery blends abstraction with reality in ways that resemble hallucinations or hypnagogic dreaming.
So I would say, embrace it all, vacuum it up into your eyes and see where it takes you. But don't forget to develop your skills, and to trust your own imagination and memory. It's essential to get beyond style and technique and dig down to an authentic expression that belongs to you. That's beneath the level of surface, and to get there, sometimes you have to unplug from all references and tunnel inside your own mind.
In the end, as long as your work is original and it communicates your own experience, it's not cheating.
In the end, as long as your work is original and it communicates your own experience, it's not cheating.
Thus Article Is it cheating to base my art on computer-generated images?
That's an article Is it cheating to base my art on computer-generated images? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Is it cheating to base my art on computer-generated images? with the link address https://idealbodys.blogspot.com/2018/12/is-it-cheating-to-base-my-art-on.html
0 Response to "Is it cheating to base my art on computer-generated images?"
Post a Comment